Explaining the model of key consumer competencies in online shopping with the Thematic analysis

Document Type : Original Article (Qualitative)

Authors

1 Department of Management, Faculty of Humanities, Torbat Heydarieh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Torbat Heydarieh, Iran

2 Department of Management, Faculty of Humanities, Neyshabour Branch, Islamic Azad University, Neyshabor, Iran

3 Department of Management, Faculty of Humanities, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran

4 Department of Management, Faculty of Administrative and Economic Sciences, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to explain the model of key competencies of consumers in online shopping. This research is a type of qualitative research, which is applicable in terms of purpose, and descriptive in terms of data collection. The statistical population of the research is buyers with high experience in online shopping, all of whom have at least 5 years of experience in online sales, and have business management education. The tool for collecting information is an interview. To investigate the validity of the qualitative part, the content validity and intra-coder and inter-coder reliability models were used. In the qualitative part of data analysis method, thematic analysis approach was compiled with MAXQDA software and using coding method. The research results first categorized and modeled the competencies of consumers in 6 stages of the online shopping process. Then, by combining these competencies, five key competencies of consumers in online shopping were identified, which included product identification, self-control, power of choice, consumer support, and decision support. The results of this research, with a combined analysis of the different competencies of consumers in online shopping, can provide important help both to consumers to increase the quality of their purchases, and to the managers of online shopping platforms to improve their services and increase their sales.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Theoretically, online shopping can benefit consumers due to the wide variety of products and convenient shopping. However, insufficient competence may prevent consumers from enjoying the benefits of online shopping. For example, incompetent consumers may suffer from poor decision-making, impulsive consumption, and online fraud (Chopdar & Balakrishnan, 2020). The effects of consumer competence on consumer satisfaction and well-being have been repeatedly investigated in traditional offline consumption (Fernandes et al, 2020; Lee et al, 2023). However, studies of consumer competence in online shopping have been very limited. Furthermore, the difference between online and offline shopping prevents the transfer of information about the offline shopping experience to online shopping. Therefore, it is important to examine the structure and performance patterns of consumer competence in online shopping. Consumers' personalities such as their gender, age, health status, education level and social status significantly affect their level of financial competence (Andronie et al, 2021). Education is a valid way to improve the financial competence of consumers, especially for college students. This trend is consistent with the fact that online shopping platforms tend to launch consumer credit products to entice low-income consumers. Therefore, improving the competence of consumers and increasing their ability to identify risks will help them make rational decisions (Guofang Liu et al, 2023). Therefore, according to the gap expressed in the research literature, the main question of the research is as follows: What is the model of the key competencies of the consumer in online shopping?
Theoretical framework
Consumer competence
Consumer competence indicates the competence needed by consumers to function effectively and rationally in the market (Park et al, 2011). For example, competent consumers must have the ability to think, identify their needs, recognize essential products, compare prices based on value, and be fully aware of salespeople (Lachance & Choquette-Bernier, 2004).
Intention to buy
Grewal et al, (1998) define purchase intention as a possibility that consumers will find a tendency to buy a product. Purchase intention refers to the fact that the consumer is likely to buy a certain brand of a product category during the purchase (Bonyadi Naeini et al, 2015).
Babashahi et al, (2021) conducted a research entitled "Designing a Competency Model for Digital Marketing Managers" with thematic analysis method. In this study, researchers conducted 17 interviews with digital marketing experts. The findings of the research, which is the final model of the research after the triple steps of open, central and selective coding, show that the competency model of digital marketing managers was formed with 114 codes and 26 concepts in three categories of technical-specialist competencies, human-behavioral competencies, and analytical competencies.
Wang et al, (2019) conducted a research titled "Understanding Emotional and Informational Impact on Customer Knowledge Contribution through Quantitative Content Analysis". Participants in the online community reviewed Xiaomi. The research findings show that informational support (information recognition and credibility of sources) and emotional support (emotional stability and emotional difference) significantly affect customer knowledge participation.
Research methodology
This research is a type of qualitative research, which is applicable in terms of purpose, and descriptive in terms of data collection. The statistical population of the research is buyers with high experience in online shopping, all of whom have at least 5 years of experience in online sales, and have business management education. The tool for data collecting is an interview. To investigate the validity of the qualitative part, the content validity and intra-coder and inter-coder reliability models were used.
Research findings
In the qualitative part of the data analysis method, the theme analysis approach is compiled with MAXQDA software and using the coding method. The research results first categorized and modeled the competencies of consumers in 6 stages of the online shopping process. Then, by combining these competencies, five key competencies of consumers in online shopping were identified, which included product identification, self-control, power of choice, consumer support, and decision support. The results of this research, with a combined analysis of the different competencies of consumers in online shopping, can provide important help both to consumers to increase the quality of their purchases and to the managers of online shopping platforms to improve their services and increase their sales.
Conclusion
The current research was conducted with the aim of explaining the model of key competencies of consumers in online shopping. The results of this research are in line with the results of Babashahi et al, (2021), Wang et al, (2019), De Pelsmacker et al, (2018), Ballestar et al, (2017) Ramanathan (2016), and Day (2011). Babashahi et al, (2021) showed that the competency model of digital marketing managers was formed with 114 codes and 26 concepts in three categories of technical-expert competencies, human-behavioral competencies, and analytical competencies.
From the point of view of consumers, customer service is an important element in online shopping, so it is expected that online shopping platforms will try to improve this part as much as possible. This will be very important in empowering consumers' power of choice. Also, in supporting consumer decision-making, platforms can help empower and support consumer decision-making by developing and improving the comments section of their websites both during and after purchase.
 

Keywords


Andronie, M., & Lăzăroiu, G., & Ștefănescu, R., & Ionescu, L., & Cocoșatu, M. (2021). Neuromanagement decision-making and cognitive algorithmic processes in the technological adoption of mobile commerce apps. Oeconomia Copernicana, 12(4), 1033-1062. doi:10.24136/oc.2021.034.
Babashahi, J., & Arabi, M., & Shafiee, M. (2021). Designing a Competency Model for Digital Marketing Managers with Thematic Analysis Method. New Marketing Research Journal, 10(4), 127-150. doi: 10.22108/nmrj.2020.120964.1992. (In Persian).
Ballestar, M., & Grau-Carles, P. & Sainz, J. (2017). Customer segmentation in e-commerce: Applications to the cashback business model. Journal of Business Research, 88, 1-8.
Berg, L. (2007). Competent consumers? Consumer competence profiles in Norway. International Journal of Consumer Studie, 31(4), 418-427. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2007.00588.x
Bolek, S. (2020). Consumer knowledge, attitudes, and judgments about food safety: A consumer analysis. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 102, 242-248. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.03.009
Bonyadi Naeini, A., & Roshanpanah Azali, P. & Tamaddoni, KH. (2015). Impact of brand equity on purchase intention and development, brand preference and customer willingness to pay higher prices. Management and Administrative Sciences Review, 4(3), 616-626.
Chen, Y. H., & Hsu, I. C. & Lin, C. C. (2010). Website attributes that increase consumer purchase intention: A conjoint analysis. Journal of Business Research, 63, 1007-1014.
Chinedu, A., & Haron, S., & Osman, S. (2016). Competencies of Mobile Telecommunication Network (MTN) Consumers in Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 21(11), 61-69. doi:10.9790/0837-2111046169
Chopdar, P. K., & Balakrishnan, J. (2020). Consumers response towards mobile commerce applications: S-O-R approach. International Journal of Information Management, 53, 102106. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102106
Dabija, D.-C., & Csorba, L. M., & Isac, F.-L., & Rusu, S. (2022). Building Trust toward Sharing Economy Platforms beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic. Electronics, 11(18), 2916.
Day, G. S. (2011). Closing the marketing capabilities gap, Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 183-195.
De Pelsmacker, P., & VanTilburg, S., & Holthof, C. (2018). Digital marketing strategies, online reviews and hotel performance, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 72, 47-55.
Fernandes, J., & Segev, S., & Leopold, J. K. (2020). When consumers learn to spot deception in advertising: testing a literacy intervention to combat greenwashing. International Journal of Advertising, 39(7), 1115-1149. doi:10.1080/02650487.2020.1765656
Grewal, D., & Monroe, K. B., & Krishnan, R. (1998). The effects of price-comparison advertising on buyers’ perceptions of acquisition value, transaction value, and behavioral intentions. Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 46–59.
Grønhøj, A. (2007). The Consumer Competence of Young Adults: A Study of Newly Formed Households. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 10(3)..
Halim, E. & Karsen, M. (2020). The impact of trust to online purchase intention of business investors. International Conference on Information Management and Technology, Bandung: Indonesia.
Lachance, M., & Choquette-Bernier, N. (2004). College Students’ consumer competence: a qualitative exploration. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 28, 433-442. doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2004.00390.x
Lee, J. J., & Ahmed, M., & Ng, A., & Mulligan, C., & Flexner, N., & L’Abbé, M. R. (2023). Nutrient intakes and top food categories contributing to intakes of energy and nutrients-of-concern consumed by Canadian adults that would require a ‘high-in’front-of-pack symbol according to Canadian labelling regulations. Plos one, 18(5), e0285095.
Liu, G., & Li, X., & Meng, Q. (2023). How to shop online: The construct and measurement of consumer competency in online shopping. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 17(2).
Liu, G., & Zhang, M. (2022). A review and prospect of consumer competency. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 28(2).
Longart, P., & Eugenia, W., & Bakir, A. (2016). Consumer Decision Process in Restaurant Selection: An Application of the Stylized EKB Model. Market-Tržište, 28, 173-190. doi:10.22598/mt/2016.28.2.173
Lu, T., & Zhuang, G. (2021). A grounded-theory-based study of customer offline experience in the context of e-retailing. Management Review, 33(7).
Malchenko, Y., & Gogua, M., & Golovacheva, K., & Smirnova, M., & Alkanova, O. (2020). A critical review of digital capability frameworks: a consumer perspective. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 22(4), 269-288. doi:10.1108/DPRG-02-2020-0028
Mansfield, E., & Wahba, R., & Grandpré, E. (2020). Integrating a Health Literacy Lens into Nutrition Labelling Policy in Canada. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 4130. doi:10.3390/ijerph17114130
Mhlanga, S., & Kotzé, T. (2014). Information Search, Alternatives Evaluation, and Coping Mechanisms of Functionally Illiterate Consumers in Retail Settings: A Developing Economy Context. Journal of African Business, 15, 136-149. doi:10.1080/15228916.2014.925363
Panwar, D., & Anand, S., & Ali, F., & Singal, K. J. I. M. R. (2019). Consumer Decision Making Process Models and Their Applications to Market Strategy. International Management Review, 15(1), 36.
Park, H., & Rha, J.-Y., & Widdows, R. (2011). Toward a Digital Goods Consumer Competence Index: An Exploratory Study. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 40. doi:10.1111/j.1552-3934.2011.02103.x
Parker, C. J., & Kuo, H.-Y. (2022). What drives generation-y women to buy fashion items online? Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 30(3), 279-294. doi:10.1080/10696679.2021.1934877
Poddar, A., & Donthu, N. & Wei, Y. (2009). Web site customer orientation, web site quality, and purchase intentions: The role of web site personality. Journal of Business Research, 62, 441-50.
Pop, R.-A., & Hlédik, E., & Dabija, D.-C. (2023). Predicting consumers' purchase intention through fast fashion mobile apps: The mediating role of attitude and the moderating role of COVID-19. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 186, 122111. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122111
Ramanathan, K. (2016), Digital marketing trends: The cues that every Indian online marketer should retrospect. Available at SSRN 2836321.
Robson, J., & Peetz, J. (2020). Gender differences in financial knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors: Accounting for socioeconomic disparities and psychological traits. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 54(3).
Rodríguez-Torrico, P., & San martín, S., & San Jose, R. (2019). What Drives M-Shoppers to Continue Using Mobile Devices to Buy? The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 27, 83-102. doi:10.1080/10696679.2018.1534211
Saeida Ardekani, S., & jahanbazi, N. (2015). Influence of store image on purchase intention: The moderating role of trust and perceived risk. New Marketing Research Journal, 5(2), 53-72.
Saha, S., & Duarte, P., & Silva, S., & Zhuang, G. (2021). Supporting sustainability by promoting online purchase through enhancement of online convenience. Environment Development and Sustainability, FREE AT: https://rdcu.be/b55jc. doi:10.1007/s10668-020-00915-
Shah, H., & Aziz, A., & Jaffari, A. R., & Waris, S., & Ejaz, W., & Fatima, M. & Sherazi., K. (2014). The impact of brands on consumer purchase intentions. Asian Journal of Business Management, 4(2), 105-110.
Stewart, C., & Yap, C. (2020). Low literacy, policy and consumer vulnerability: Are we really doing enough? International Journal of Consumer Studies, 44. doi:10.1111/ijcs.12569
Stojmenovic, M., & Biddle, R., & Grundy, J., & Farrell, V. (2019). The influence of textual and verbal word-of-mouth on website usability and visual appeal. The Journal of Supercomputing, 75. doi:10.1007/s11227-018-2313-x
Viswanathan, M., & Umashankar, N., & Sreekumar, A., & Goreczny, A. (2021). Marketplace Literacy as a Pathway to a Better World: Evidence from Field Experiments in Low-Access Subsistence Marketplaces. Journal of marketing, 85(3), 113-129. doi:10.1177/0022242921998385
Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y., & Carretero, S., & Van den Brande, L. (2016). DigComp 2.0: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens. Update Phase 1: the Conceptual Reference Model.
Wang, X., & Ow, T. T., & Feng, Y., & Liu, L. (2019). Understanding the emotional and informational influence on customer knowledge contribution through quantitative content analysis. Proceedings Management Faculty Research and Publications, 58(2), 1124-1139.

  • Receive Date 01 July 2023
  • Revise Date 16 November 2023
  • Accept Date 25 January 2024