Services with a comparative advantage for the development of private consulting businesses in the agricultural employment market

Alimirzaei, Irfan; Hoseini, Seyyed Mahmoud

doi:10.22034/jnamm.2023.423064.1025

Services with a comparative advantage for the development of private consulting businesses in the agricultural employment market

Document Type : Original Article (Quantified)

Authors

Irfan alimirzaei ¹

Seyyed Mahmoud hoseini ²

¹ Assistant Professor of Agricultural Education and Extension Institute; Agricultural Research, Education and Promotion Organization; Tehran; Iran

² Professor, Department of Agricultural Promotion and Education, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22034/jnamm.2023.423064.1025

Abstract

The current research aimed to identify the functional areas with relative advantage to help empower and develop private agricultural extension consultants and related economic enterprises at the level of two provinces of Tehran and Alborz. Based on this, considering the possibility of applying the findings in the field of practice, this research is among the decision-oriented applied research in terms of general orientation and goal. From the point of view of the researcher's degree of control over the variables under study and the background conditions of the research, it is considered a type of non-experimental research that describes the phenomena under investigation in a single period of time. The statistical population of the research included 25 key experts from the public and sectors, whom were purposefully selected and examined. The research method was based on documentary studies, semi-structured interviews, and quantitative survey using a researcher-made questionnaire. In order to identify functional gaps in the field of performance of private promotion companies, or in other words, to identify the degree of relative advantage of the various service delivery areas of the mentioned companies in the region, the weighted average score of the differences using the needs assessment relationship was calculated. Based on the findings from the analysis of the opinions of knowledgeable sample people and the calculated relative advantages, "advertising, stimulating, organizing and strengthening the demand dimension for research and development processes and agricultural innovations" is the most prioritized; and "Implementation of monitoring and evaluation plans to ensure the quality of promotion and evaluation services from active businesses in the region" were identified as the least priority service areas for focusing on the role of private agricultural consultants in the region.

Keywords

Agricultural innovation system

promoting pluralistic agriculture

private consulting services

professional competence

comparative advantage in services

شاقلی، ر. و علیمیرزایی، ع. ( 1400 ). شایستگیهای حرفهای تقاضا مدار برای محتواگزینی دورههای آموزش
کشاورزی از دیدگاه خبرگان. فصل نامه علمی پژوهش مدیریت آموزش کشاورزی. شماره 57 و 58 . تابستان و پاییز
. 1400 . صص 88 73
پورکریمی، ج. و همکاران ( 1396 ). اثر میانجی تعهد حرفهای در رابطه بین صلاحیت حرفهای و عملکرد شغلی (مورد
.833- مطالعه: کارشناسان آموزش دانشگاه تهران). مجله مدیریت فرهنگ سازمانی. دوره 15 ، شماره 4. صص 856
علیمیرزایی، ع. ( 1395 ). طراحی الگوی نهادینهسازی مشارکت بخش خصوصی برای نظام ترویج کشاورزی کثرتگرا
(مورد مطالعه؛ استانهای البرز و تهران). رساله دکترای تخصصی. دانشکده اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی دانشگاه تهران.
-Asadihkoob, H. and Ebrahimi, M. S. (2015). Farmer’s Attitude to Agricultural and Rural
Development in Southwest Iran. Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Sciences, Vol.
5, Pp 86-90.
-Gemo, H. R. et al. (2013). The Role of a Pluralistic Extension System in Enhancing Agriculture
Productivity in Mozambique. South African Journal of Agricultural Extension, Vol. 41, Pp 59-75.
-Hellin, J. (2012). Agricultural Extension, Collective Action and Innovation Systems: Lessons on
Network Brokering from Peru and Mexico. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension,
18, Pp 141-159.
-Ingram, J. (2015). Framing Niche-Regime Linkage as Adaptation: An Analysis of Learning and
Innovation Networks for Sustainable Agriculture Across Europe. Journal of Rural Studies, Vol. 40,
Pp 59-75.
-Jiggins, J. (2016). Innovation Platforms and Projects to Support Smallholder Development-
Experiences from Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Cahiers Agriculture, Vol. 25, 64002. DOI:
10.1051/cagri/2016051
-Kaur, J. et al. (2014). Attitude of Farmers towards Privatization of Agricultural Extension Services.
Research journal of Agricultural Science Digest, Vol. 34, Pp 81-86.
-Klerkx, L. et al. (2012). Advances in Knowledge Brokering in the Agricultural Sector: towards
Innovation System Facilitation. Journal of IDS Bulletin, Vol. 43, Issue 5, Pp 53-60.
-Kidd, A. D. et al. (2000). Privatizing Agricultural Extension: Caveat Emptor. Journal of Rural
Studies, Vol. 16, Pp 95-102.
-Mengal, A. A. (2014). Historical Overview of Agricultural Extension Services in Pakistan. Journal of
The Macro Theme Review, Vol. 3, Pp 23-36
-Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013). Agricultural Innovation Systems:
A Framework for Analyzing the Role of Government. OECD Publishing, Paris, France.
-Okorley, E. L. et al. (2010). Towards A Cross-Sector Pluralistic Agricultural Extension System in A
Decentralized Policy Context: A Ghanaian Case Study. Journal of Sustainable Development in
Africa, Vol. 12, No 4, Pp 1-10.
-Pretty, J. N. (1995). Regenerating Agriculture: Policies and Practice for Sustainability and Selfreliance.
The Joseph Henry Press book. International Institute for Environment and Development,
London.
-Ragasa, C. (2016). Factors Affecting Performance of Agricultural Extension: Evidence from
Democratic Republic of Congo. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, Vol. 22,
Pp113-143.
-Rasouliazar, S. et al. (2011). The Investigation Perception of Agricultural Extension Agents about
affective Factors on Effectiveness of Agricultural Advisory Services Companies in Iran. Journal of
American Science, Vol. 7, Pp 445-451. Retrieved from http://www.americanscience.org.
-Rivera, W. M. and Alex, G. (2004). Decentralized Systems: Case Studies of International Initiatives.
Washington, DC: The World Bank.
-Rivera, W. M. and Qamar, M. K. (2003). Agricultural Extension, Rural Development and The Food
Security Challenge. Rome. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved
from http://www.fao.org.
-Samy, M. et al. (2003). Structural Change in Agriculture: Privatization of Information and the Role of
Extension. AIAEE 2003. Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference. Raleigh, North Carolina,
USA.
-Schut, M. et al. (2014). Systems Approaches to Innovation in Crop Protection. A Systematic
Literature Review. Journal of Crop Protection, Vol. 56, Pp 98-108.
-Schut, M. et al. (2015). RAAIS: Rapid Appraisal of Agricultural Innovation Systems. (Part II).
Integrated Analysis of Parasitic Weed Problems in Rice in Tanzania. Journal of Agricultural
Systems, Vol. 132, Pp 12-24.
-Schut, M. et al. (2016). Innovation Platforms: Experiences with their Institutional Embedding in
Agricultural Research for Development. Journal of Experimental Agriculture, Vol. 52, Pp 537-561.
-Schut, M. et al. (2016). Sustainable Intensification of Agricultural Systems in the Central African
Highlands: The need for institutional innovation. Journal of Agricultural Systems, Vol. 145, Pp
165-176.
-Temel, T. et al. (2003). Systems Analysis by Graph Theoretical Techniques: Assessment of the
Agricultural Innovation System of Azerbaijan. Journal of Agricultural Systems, Vol. 77, Pp 91-
116.
-Tobin, D. et al. (2013) Factors Affecting Growers’ On-farm Food Safety Practices: Evaluation
Findings from Penn State Extension Programming. Journal of Food Control, Vol. 33, Pp 73-80.