An analysis of the direct and indirect effects of the relationship between personality and adaptability on entrepreneurial behavior in Trophy Generation entrepreneurs.

Document Type : Original Article (Quantified)

Author

Department of Market and Business, Y. C., Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran

Abstract
Abstract
This study was conducted to examine the direct and indirect effects of the relationship between personality and propensity for adaptability on entrepreneurial behavior among Trophy Generation entrepreneurs. Achieving control and stability in entrepreneurs' behavior is one of the most important concerns of any business. Since personality is an important factor in behavioral responses, understanding it will increase the ability to predict and the power to shape behaviors. This research posits that individuals’ personalities can have a significant impact on their propensity to adapt to conditions and on the emergence of entrepreneurial behavioral responses. On the other hand, the potential and new generation of entrepreneurs, referred to here as the Trophy Generation, possesses their own distinct behavioral characteristics. This paper attempts to test and investigate its claim within this generation. Accordingly, young managers of knowledge-based companies in Yazd province were selected as the study population, and 116 people were chosen as a sample by simple random sampling. This research employed a quantitative, cross-sectional approach, using a questionnaire instrument and random sampling for assessment. To investigate the research topic, hypotheses were presented in the form of a conceptual model and then tested using structural equation modeling for reliability, validity, the structural model, and finally fit and quality, conducted with SmartPLS 4.1 software. The findings indicate that the personality of the Trophy Generation and adaptability tendencies have a positive and significant effect on entrepreneurial behavior. The findings also show that the mediating role of propensity for adaptability cannot be rejected.
Introduction
Organizational entrepreneurship involves cultivating entrepreneurial behaviors within an organization. Researchers believe that organizational entrepreneurship is a very broad concept encompassing the creation, development, and implementation of new ideas or behaviors (Mahmoudi, 2023). Entrepreneurial behavior can be seen as the study of human behaviors that pursue the exploitation of entrepreneurial opportunities through the creation and development of new businesses (Panahi et al., 2024). Globally, entrepreneurial behaviors play a central role in carrying out entrepreneurial activities, and research has even shown that they affect economic growth and development. Although there is no consensus that key entrepreneurial behaviors necessarily appear in a particular context or for a specific generation, studies indicate that multiple factors influence entrepreneurial behaviors and actions. Among these factors are an individual entrepreneur’s beliefs, personality, and intentions, which ensure their emergence and persistence. The stronger these personality factors are, the more likely an individual is to engage in entrepreneurial behavior and to sustain prior behaviors. Clearly, the manner in which these traits manifest increases the likelihood of unforeseen events occurring and can lead to unexpected consequences (Panahi et al., 2024). Past research on entrepreneurship among the Trophy generation has emphasized areas such as: the role of social media in building trust and satisfaction for entrepreneurs, the impact of the business environment on entrepreneurial behavior, and even their patterns of green purchasing behavior (Liu et al., 2019). However, research on the entrepreneurial behavior of this generation remains limited and gaps still exist in the literature. This is both because the topic is interdisciplinary (management and psychology) and because the propensity or biological imperative for these individuals to adapt to entrepreneurial responses has not been considered. These are gaps that necessitate attention to a new perspective in this research.
In particular, most previous studies on Trofi generation entrepreneurial behavior have focused on developed economies, whose business environments differ and whose findings may not be applicable to less-developed economies such as Iran, where more than 80 percent of entrepreneurs still face startup challenges. Moreover, this study contributes to the existing literature by examining the role of two theories—namely, the generational cohort theory and complex adaptive systems theory—in explaining entrepreneurial behavior (Ssekiziyivu & Banyenzaki, 2021). This study also adds to the field by confirming that Trofi generation personality and adaptation inclinations are significantly associated with entrepreneurial behavior.
On the other hand, research indicates that the founding of startups and knowledge-based companies plays an important role in countries’ entrepreneurial development and that business success requires the creation of an effective ecosystem in which an innovation culture and provision of necessary supports exist. Furthermore, ongoing and reciprocal processes among influencing factors help entrepreneurs succeed sustainably in today’s competitive and complex environment. The occurrence of multiple failures among startups in Iran indicates a problem in the entrepreneurial processes of these institutions (Golara et al., 2025). In particular, entrepreneurial organizations are largely formed around individual or team ideas that react quickly to environmental influences and often lack sufficient readiness to cope with external changes and triggers. This issue leads to failure at various stages of their entrepreneurial journey. Therefore, selecting knowledge-based companies as successful startups is an appropriate option for investigating the research topic. Ultimately, this study seeks to answer whether the personality of Trofi generation individuals can influence their adaptation inclinations and ultimately lead to entrepreneurial behavior.
Theoretical Framework of the Research
Entrepreneurship and Entrepreneurial Behavior
Entrepreneurial behavior refers to those entrepreneurial actions taken to start an investment, manage and develop it, and bear all the risks with the hope of earning profit. Entrepreneurship is a struggle in which an individual needs certain characteristics to succeed (Wang et al., 2022).
Trophy Generation Entrepreneurs
The definition of the Trophy Generation has so far been limited to birth years and the period when they reached maturity (Han et al., 2023). The generation born between 1980 and 2000 (1360 to 1380 in the Iranian calendar) is called the Trophy Generation. Trophies are also known as Generation Y, the Me Generation, and the Millennials (Dalton, 2014). A generation is a recognizable group of people whose birth years typically share a common 20-year span (Dimock, 2019).
Generational Personality and Entrepreneurial Behavior among Trophy Entrepreneurs
According to some researchers (Weber & Urick, 2023), age cohort generally defines Trophies. Based on this, generational personality is a method of categorizing a group of people with similarities tied to the era in which they were born and the period when they reached maturity (Boyle, 2023). Generational personality aligns with the domain of entrepreneurial behavior.
Generational Personality and Adaptability Tendencies
The Trophy Generation’s personality is described as the most creative and adaptable generation (Horsaengchai, 2011). Trophies quickly adapt to new technologies and their environment (Boyle, 2023).
The Mediating Role of Adaptability Tendencies in the Relationship between Generational Personality and Entrepreneurial Behavior
The characteristics of the Trophy Generation strongly influence them (Boyle, 2023). Trophy entrepreneurs are pragmatic and innovation-oriented and focus on long-term development (Zheng et al., 2022). Evidence shows that Trophies are categorized differently because the economic, technological, and social aspects of their developmental period are unique (Twenge, 2013). Previous studies have reported that Trophy entrepreneurs use generational traits to perform with adaptability to overcome challenges in the business environment. Adaptability is conceptualized as an effective response experienced by a person to adjust to changing conditions (Othman et al., 2018).
Compatibility Tendencies and Entrepreneurial Behavior
Trophies have evolved alongside technologies that require them to continuously adapt to changes and, consequently, to exhibit creative and innovative behaviors (Podsakoff et al., 2003).
Research Methodology
This study is a quantitative applied study, conducted as a cross-sectional survey. The statistical population consists of managers and founders of knowledge-based companies, and the required sample size was determined to be 116 people using Cochran’s method. The data collection instrument in this study was a developed questionnaire, the sampling method was simple random sampling, and the analytical method used in this study was structural equation modeling.
Findings
According to the research findings, reliability tests (Cronbach’s alpha, composite reliability, and Rho) and validity tests (convergent: factor loadings and AVE; and discriminant: Fornell–Larcker) confirmed the measurement models. The structural model tests also confirmed all direct and indirect relationships in this study, with t-statistics greater than 1.96. All tests in this section were performed using SmartPLS 4.1.
Conclusion
The present study, aiming to examine the role of personality and the propensity for adaptability in the entrepreneurial behavior of the Trophy generation, is aligned with research such as Pidduck et al. (2023), Sirajje (2023), Duong (2023), and Graham (2023). The results indicate that individuals within a particular age cohort tend to share a distinct set of beliefs because they grew up during the same period. Any positive change in generational personality is accompanied by a positive change in adaptability tendencies and entrepreneurial behavior. Overall, the relationship between generational personality and entrepreneurial behavior is significant both directly and indirectly. In other words, part of this association can be mediated by adaptability tendencies in relation to entrepreneurial behavior among Trophies. Put differently, millennial entrepreneurs who believe there is something in their character that leads to their success are more likely to challenge their assumptions about a project before working on it. As a result, they enter new situations innovatively and design concepts and projects that benefit them.
Based on the obtained results, it is recommended that knowledge-based companies pay special attention to the personality traits of the Trophy generation during recruitment and hiring processes. Additionally, organizations should strengthen adaptability tendencies among Trophy-generation employees by designing training and development programs.

Keywords


Ahmadi, P., Babashahi, J and Khodashenas, L. (2011). Considering the Relationship Between Personality Factors and Entrepreneurship: A Research About The Personnel of Sadad Informatics Corporations. Organizational Resources Management Researches, 1(3), 1-22. (In Persian)
Arab, S. (2024). Investigating the effect of personality features on the formation of entrepreneurial intention in young people: the mediating role of entrepreneurial mindset. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Research, 3(2), 98-117. doi: 10.22034/eir.2024.450709.1068. (In Persian)
Asiimwe, G.B. (2023), “Interrogating unemployment amid growth: tracking youth unemployment in neo-liberal Uganda, 1990-2019”, Journal of Asian and African Studies, Vol. 58 No. 5, pp. 812-828, doi: 10.1177/00219096221076113.
Bagheri, A. and Zhu, Y. (2023), “Millennial entrepreneurial persistence under harsh contextual environments in Iran”, Journal of General Management, Vol. 48 No. 2, pp. 171-183, doi: 10.1177/03063070221080558. (In Persian)
Boyle, K.A. (2023), “Millennial career-identities: reevaluating social identification and intergenerational relations”, Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 89-109, doi: 10.1080/15350770.2021.1945989.
Castellanza, L. and Woywode, M. (2024), “Types, determinants, and outcomes of entrepreneurial behaviours during crises”, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, pp. 1-30, doi: 10.1080/08985626.2024.2324320.
Dalton, K. (2014), “Bridging the digital divide and guiding the millennial generation’s research and analysis”, Barry Law Review, Vol. 1, doi: 10.1525/sp.2007.54.1.23.
Dimock, M. (2019), “Defining generations: where Millennials end and Generation Z begins”, Pew Research Center, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 1-7.
Drucker, P. (1970), “The new markets and the new capitalism”, The Public Interest, Vol. 21, p. 44.
Duong, C.D. (2023), “Karmic beliefs and social entrepreneurial intentions: a moderated mediation model of environmental complexity and empathy”, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, Vol. 9 No. 1, 100022, doi: 10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100022.
Frese, M. (2015), Psychological Interventions for Effective Entrepreneurial Mind-Sets, NUS, Business School, Deptartment of Management and Organization, Singapore.
Golara, P., AdibSaber, F. and Nasiri, M. (2025). Investigating the Effective Factors on the Development of Digital Entrepreneurship and the Establishment of Sports Startups in Iran. (e228865). Journal of New Approaches in Management and Marketing, 4(1), e228865 doi: 10.22034/jnamm.2025.529483.1099. (In Persian)
Goldstein, J., Hazy, J. and Lichtenstein, B. (2010), Complexity and the Nexus of Leadership: Leveraging Non-linear Science to Create Ecologies of Innovation, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, NY, ISBN 0230107710.
Graham, T.M. (2023), Considerations and Characteristics of the Millennial Leader in Today’s Global Society, (Ed.), IGI Global, Hershey, PA.
Guga, E. and Peta, E. (2023), “Exploring the factors influencing entrepreneurial behavior among Albanian millennials”, International Journal of Professional Business Review, Vol. 8 No. 8, e03636, doi: 10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i8.3636.
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. Journal of marketing theory and practice, 19(2), 139-152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
Han, C., Mamahit, H. and Panggara, R. (2023), “Christlikeness: an attempt to build Christian spirituality for Indonesian millennial generation”, Evangelikal: Jurnal Teologi Injili Dan Pembinaan Warga Jemaat, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 23-34, doi: 10.46445/ejti.v7i1.559.
Hermawan, I., Inayah, I., Hindrawati, G., Suharmanto, S. and Nugroho, J. (2024), “Fostering creative performance in digital business: the role of innovative millennial entrepreneurship”, Management and Accounting Review (MAR), Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 521-540.
Horsaengchai, W. (2011), Are millennials potential entrepreneurs?
Howe, N. and Strauss, W. (2003), Millennials Go to College, American Association of Collegiate Registrars, Washington, pp. 1-4.
Ismail, I.J. (2022), “I trust friends before I trust companies: the mediation of WOM and brand love on psychological contract fulfilment and repurchase intention”, Management Matters, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 167-186, doi: 10.1108/MANM-02-2022-0033.
Kessler, A.N. (2016), Retaining the non-retainable: a correlational exploration of work centrality and turnover among the millennial workforce, (May).
Kim, R.E. and Mackey, B. (2014), “International environmental law as a complex adaptive system”, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 5-24, doi: 10.1007/s10784-013-9225-2.
Liu, J., Zhu, Y., Serapio, M.G. and Cavusgil, S.T. (2019), “The new generation of millennial entrepreneurs: a review and call for research”, International Business Review, Vol. 28 No. 5, 102581, doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.05.001.
Mahmoudi, H. A. (2023). Investigating the development of entrepreneurship for creativity and innovation in organizations and industries: providing challenges and solutions. Journal of New Approaches in Management and Marketing, 2(1), 91-100. doi: 10.22034/jnamm.2023.423508.1028. (In Persian)
Mayanja, S., Ntayi, J.M., Munene, J.C., Wasswa, B. and Kagaari, J.R. (2023), “Ecologies of innovation as a mediator between nexus of generative influence and entrepreneurial networking among small and medium enterprises in Uganda”, Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 236-262, doi: 10.1080/08276331.2020.1764731.
Morris, M.H. and Zahra, S. (2000), “Adaptation of the business concept over time: the case of historically disadvantaged South African owner/managers”, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 38 No. 1, pp. 92-100.
Nadler, J.T., Weston, R. and Voyles, E.C. (2015), “Stuck in the middle: the use and interpretation of mid-points in items on questionnaires”, The Journal of General Psychology, Vol. 142 No. 2, pp. 71-89, doi: 10.1080/00221309.2014.994590.
Nicolaou, N. and Shane, S. (2009), “Can genetic factors influence the likelihood of engaging in entrepreneurial activity?”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 1-22, available at:, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2007.11.003.
Nsereko, I., Balunywa, W., Munene, J., Orobia, L. and Muhammed, N. (2018), “Personal initiative: its power in social entrepreneurial venture creation”, Cogent Business and Management, Vol. 5, No. 1, 1443686, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2018.1443686.
Ohadi, D. and hazraty, M. (2024). Investigating the effect of cultural diversity on innovative work behavior and psychological adaptation with regard to the role of cultural intelligence (domestic and foreign senior experts working in South Pars Gas Complex Company). Journal of New Approaches in Management and Marketing, 2(2), 56-73. doi: 10.22034/jnamm.2024.428469.1042.
Othman, R., Kamal, N.M., Alias, N.E., Ismail, S. and Sahiq, A.N.M. (2018), “Positive psychological traits and career adaptability among millennials”, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Vol. 8 No. 9, pp. 1420-1433.
Panahi, A., Habibirad, A. and Motie, H. (2024). The Impact of Entrepreneurial Intention on Entrepreneurial Behavior of Students Considering the Moderating Role of Fear of Failure and Economic Literacy. Journal of New Approaches in Management and Marketing, 3(1), 63-85. doi: 10.22034/jnamm.2024.443804.1049. (In Persian)
Pew Research Center (2015), Millennials Generation Next, Confident, Connected and Open to Change, National Center for Health Statistics, MD.
Pidduck, R.J., Clark, D.R. and Lumpkin, G.T. (2023), “Entrepreneurial mindset: dispositional beliefs, opportunity beliefs, and entrepreneurial behavior”, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 61 No. 1, pp. 45-79, doi: 10.1080/00472778.2021.1907582.
Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y. and Podsakoff, N.P. (2003), “Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 88 No. 5, pp. 879-903, doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
Schumpeter, J. (1965), “Economic theory and entrepreneurial history”, in Aitken Explorations in Enterprise, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, by NS T€ul€ucea 2015.
Sessoms-Penny, S., Underwood, K.M. and Taylor, J. (2023), “A decade later: exploring managerial insights on millennials”, Management Matters, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 36-52, doi: 10.1108/MANM-03-2022-0044.
Sirajje, Yiga., Abaho, Ernest. Nsereko, Isa., Basalirwa, Edith Mwebaza., Muhamed and, Ngoma., Balunywa. (2024). Generational persona and entrepreneurial behavior among millennial entrepreneurs: the mediating role of adaptability tendencies, Management Matters Emerald Publishing Limited 2752-8359, DOI 10.1108/MANM-02-2024-0010\
Ssekiziyivu, B. and Banyenzaki, Y. (2021), “Business incubation practices and sustainability of incubate start-up firms in Uganda”, Cogent Business and Management, Vol. 8 No. 1, 1963168.
Struckell, E.M. (2019), “Millennials: a generation of un-entrepreneurs”, Journal of Business Diversity, Vol. 19 No. 2.
Travis, J., & Craig, S. B. (2022). Personality and Entrepreneurial Behavior: Relations among Entrepreneurship-Relevant Traits and Entrepreneurial Status, Intentions, and Prior Venture Experiences. Psych, 4(4), 918-933. https://doi.org/10.3390/psych4040068.
Tsaknis, P. A., Sahinidis, A. G., Xanthopoulou, P. I., & Vassiliou, E. E. (2022). The impact of personality and entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial intention. Corporate Governance and Organizational Behavior Review, 6(1), 130–138. https://doi.org/10.22495/cgobrv6i1p9.
Twenge, J.M. (2006), Generation Me: Why Today’s Young Americans Are More Confident, Assertive, Entitled, and More Motivated than Ever before, Free Press, New York.
Twenge, J.M. (2013), “The evidence for generation me and against generation we”, Emerging Adulthood, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 11-16, doi: 10.1177/2167696812466548.
Wang, Y., Zhou, H., Zhang, Y. and Sun, X. (2022), “Role of entrepreneurial behavior in achieving sustainable digital economy”, Front Public Health, Vol. 10, 829289, PMID: 35284394; PMCID: PMC8913519, doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.829289.
Weber, J. and Urick, M.J. (2023), “Searching for a stronger generational understanding than just age: a multi-country analysis of millennials’ personal values and moral reasoning”, Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 110-135, doi: 10.1080/15350770.2021.1951920.
Yiga, S., Abaho, E., Nsereko, I., Ngoma, M., Balunywa, W. and Basalirwa, E.M. (2023), “Exhibiting entrepreneurial behavior at work: a lived experience of a millennial entrepreneur”, Journal of Work-Applied Management, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 314-329, doi: 10.1108/jwam-04-2023-0033.
Yolles, M. (2018), “The complexity continuum, Part 1: hard and soft theories”, Kybernetes, Vol. 48, No. 6, pp. 1330-1354, doi: 10.1108/k-06-2018-0337.
Zheng, X., Yang, Y., Zhang, Q. et al. (2022). Linking entrepreneurial learning to entrepreneurial competencies: the moderating role of personality traits. Curr Psychol 42, 11597–11612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02465-1.
 
Volume 3, Issue 1 - Serial Number 4
Spring 2024
Pages 183-205

  • Receive Date 23 March 2024
  • Revise Date 25 April 2024
  • Accept Date 27 May 2024