Modeling the psychological characteristics of founders of industrial small and medium enterprises in Mazandaran

Tourang, Seyd Kamal; Hashemi Nasab, Mohammad Hossein

doi:10.22034/jnamm.2026.573755.1247

Modeling the psychological characteristics of founders of industrial small and medium enterprises in Mazandaran

Document Type : Original Article (Quantified)

Authors

Seyd kamal Tourang ¹

Mohammad Hossein Hashemi Nasab ²

¹ Department of Industrial Engineering, Babol Noshirvani University of Technology, Babol, Iran

² Department of Public Administration,, Sari Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sari, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22034/jnamm.2026.573755.1247

Abstract

Abstract
The purpose of this study is to model the psychological characteristics of founders of small and medium‑sized enterprises (SMEs) within the industrial cooperatives of Mazandaran Province. This research is applicable in terms of purpose, and quantitative in terms of methodology. The statistical population consists of 893 business founders across the province, as defined by the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM). Using Cochran’s formula, a sample of 186 individuals was selected through simple random sampling. The data collection instrument was the Kiggundu (2002) questionnaire. Data analysis was performed by SPSS and LISREL software.
The findings indicate that the overall psychological construct under examination, within a measurement model and path analysis framework (structural equation modeling), explains the process of business start‑up. Each psychological variable exerts both direct and indirect (interactive) effects on this process. Among these, the highest overall influence belongs to the sub‑variable of internal locus of control, followed respectively by tolerance of ambiguity, job autonomy, need for achievement, motivation, and risk‑taking. The study concludes by recommending that policymakers and relevant authorities, in order to enhance business start‑up processes and foster productive employment, pay attention to these psychological variables in addition to other environmental and structural conditions.
Introduction
Entrepreneurs play a critical role in economic growth through leadership, management, innovation, efficiency, job creation, competition, productivity, and the establishment of new firms. It is widely believed that societies today require an “entrepreneurial revolution,” one whose significance in the current century surpasses even that of the Industrial Revolution. Business start‑ups are considered a driving force behind economic development, employment generation, and social improvement (Jeanneaux et al., 2025). Entrepreneurship education focuses on equipping trainees with the knowledge and skills necessary to initiate and manage new ventures. In recent years, a notable shift has occurred, with increasing emphasis on developing broader entrepreneurial competencies such as creativity, problem‑solving, opportunity recognition, and adaptability (Kallas & Parts, 2021).
Given the crucial role of business creation and the successful track record of entrepreneurs in the development of many countries—and considering the economic challenges faced by our own nation in both the private and public sectors—promoting and institutionalizing the concept of entrepreneurship, as well as establishing supportive cultural conditions and developing assessment models for identifying and supporting entrepreneurs, are of vital importance. The country’s young demographic structure and the urgent need for job creation, along with the necessity of reducing dependence on primary raw materials and moving beyond a single‑product economy, combined with the dynamics of the information society, compel national policymakers to seek reliable alternative resources. Undoubtedly, in line with the requirements of the information society, such a resource is nothing other than creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurial business creation (Masoudi & Asgari, 2024).
In social network theory, business start‑up is viewed as a process embedded within dynamic networks of social relationships—relationships that may either restrict or facilitate the entrepreneur’s access to resources and opportunities. Therefore, entrepreneurs as a group are both unique and diverse. Their similarities distinguish them from non‑entrepreneurs, while their differences create a heterogeneous group, making the study of entrepreneurial characteristics inherently complex (Chauhan et al., 2024). Accordingly, based on the above discussions, the present study seeks to answer the following question: How can the psychological characteristics of founders of small and medium‑sized enterprises in the industrial cooperatives of Mazandaran be modeled?
Theoretical Foundations
Business Start‑Up
Business start‑up is an interdisciplinary subject shaped by the cumulative contributions of various fields such as economics, psychology, anthropology, sociology, and management (Vajdi Vahid et al., 2024). Shams et al. (2025) examined the relationship between brand dependence and business performance through inter‑organizational relationships and interactions within supply chain management environments. Their findings revealed that buyer–supplier interactive relationships and buyer–supplier commitment act as key mediators between brand dependence—specifically brand affordability, brand equity, and brand loyalty—and buyer–supplier communication, as well as between brand dependence and business performance. This study contributes to the branding literature by introducing the concept of brand dependence within the context of small and medium‑sized enterprises (SMEs). In another study, Rezaei Sadrabadi et al. (2025) explored the role of open innovation, social capital, co‑created knowledge, and collaboration with external partners in enhancing organizational agility amid the turbulence of today’s dynamic environment. Their research proposed a new framework for applying open‑agility enablers in selected SMEs located in the Yazd industrial zone. The findings indicate that organizational agility is significantly influenced by open innovation, and subsequently by collaboration with external partners and co‑created knowledge. Moreover, social capital has a strong and positive impact on the development of co‑created knowledge within these selected SMEs.
Research Methodology
This study is applicable in terms of purpose, and quantitative in its method of implementation. The statistical population consists of 893 business founders across the province, identified according to the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) definition of business start‑ups. Using Cochran’s formula, a sample size of 186 individuals was determined and selected through simple random sampling. The data collection instrument used in this study was the questionnaire developed by Kiggundu (2002).
Research Findings
The data were analyzed by SPSS and LISREL software. The results indicate that the overall psychological construct examined in this study, assessed through a path‑analysis measurement model (structural equation modeling), significantly explains the business start‑up process. Each of the psychological dimensions demonstrated both direct and indirect (interactive) effects on this process. Among these variables, the strongest overall effect belonged to internal locus of control, followed by tolerance for ambiguity, work independence, need for achievement, motivation, and risk‑taking, respectively.
The findings suggest that policymakers and relevant authorities should, in addition to other structural and economic conditions, pay close attention to these psychological characteristics in order to improve the business start‑up process and promote productive employment.S
Conclusion
The present study was conducted to investigate the modeling of the psychological characteristics of founders of small and medium‑sized enterprises (SMEs) within the industrial cooperatives of Mazandaran Province. The results of it align with the results of Shams et al. (2025), Jeanneaux et al. (2025), Omidi (2025), Monaisen et al. (2025), Rezaei Sadrabadi et al. (2025), Vahabi Abyaneh & Mobini Dehkordi (2025), Anne Magro et al, (2022), Baizhou et al. (2023), Mohtadi (2023), Bauwens et al. (2024), Chauhan et al. (2024), Farmahini Farahani et al. (2025), and Kallas & Parts (2021). Anne Magro et al. (2022) concluded that the prevailing viewpoints and perceptions toward entrepreneurship and its effects in France is not such positive. This study has also presented viewpoints about the factors effecting the success and failure of educational programmes, and investigated that how the business faculty of George Meissen University injects the free training approach into the business education, and utilizes a combination of effective methods such as primary year’s seminars, shared thinking experiences, learning societies, cooperative assignments, specialized researches, society-based learning, training, final courses and projects, and global diversity and learning. The Meissen experience demonstrates the possibility and advantages of this integration.
According to the results, the following suggestions are presented:
In order to improve the entrepreneurship in the statistical population under study according to the entrepreneur’s personal characteristics, it might be attempted by paying attention to the six personal variables which defines it in the real world. Therefore, it is necessary, at the first step, the most attention paid to the inner control locus variable, following the rest varables according to their respective importance.

Keywords

Psychological Characteristics

Business Start Up

Industrial Cooperatives

Work Independence

Need for Achievement

Motivation

Subjects

business management

Abdi Jamayran, A., & Niknam, M., & Rangriz, H. (2024). Presenting the model of factors affecting the resilience of entrepreneurial behavior in Technical and Vocational University of Alborz province. Management and Educational Perspective, 6(2), 431-454. doi: 10.22034/jmep.2024.425579.1295.. (In Persian).

Baizhou, L., & Wei, H., & Jing, L., & Udomsak, W. (2023), A leap of faith that echoes well? The value impact of Chinese firms starting up business overseas, Global Finance Journal, (57), pp.1-23.

Bauwens, Th., & Kris, H., & Marko, H., & Julian, K. (2024), Building innovation ecosystems for circularity: Start-up business models in the food and construction sectors in the Netherlands, Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 481, 143970. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143970

Chauhan, S., & Kavita, Ch., & Saurabh, S., & Seema, M., & Vimal, K., & Sumanjee, S. (2024), Analyzing family support mediating role between motivational factors and sustainable entrepreneurial intentions: A study on university students, Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship, 3(3), 100076. DOI: 10.1016/j.stae.2024.100076

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of test", Psychometrica, (16), pp. 297-334.

Churchill, G. A. Jr. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs", Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 16, February.64–73.

Farmahini Farahani, S., & Khamseh, A., & Bayat Tork, A. (2025). The structural model of startup valuation with a focus on fintech startups. Journal of value creating in Business Management, 5(3), 98-130. doi: 10.22034/jvcbm.2024.449609.1345. (In Persian).

Hair, J. F., & Anderson, R. E. & Tatham, R. L. & Black, W. C. (1998) "Multivariate data analysis", Prentice Hall International Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ.

Hisrich, R. D., & Peters, M. (2002), "Entrepreneurship", New York: Mc-Graw Hill.

Hult, G. M. T., & Ferrell, O. C. (1997), "A global learning organization structure and market information processing", Journal of Business Research, Vol. 40, pp.155–166.

Jafari, A. M., & Ghorbani, M., & Pourebrahim Abadi, S., & Avazpour, L., & Rafiee, H. (2025). Strategic Analysis of Coastal Businesses on Qeshm Island with a Focus on the Shrimp Aquaculture Sector. Social Business, 2(3), 261-277. doi: 10.22059/jsbu.2025.400498.1054. (In Persian).

Jeanneaux, Ph., & Eliot, W., & Yann, D., & Geoffroy, E., & Laur L., (2025), Structure and determinants of the cost of setting up a farm: The case of young farmers in Central France, Journal of Rural Studies, Volume 114, 103583, pp. 1-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103583

Joreskong, K.G., & Sorbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: A Guide to the Program and Application", 2^Ed, Chicago: SPSS Software.

Julia, P., & Sunčica, O. P., & Anamarija, D. (2025), Changing nature of entrepreneurship education – From starting a business to entrepreneurial competence, Reference Module in Social Sciences, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-26629-4.00161-1.

Kallas, E., & Parts, E. (2021), From entrepreneurial intention to enterprise creation: The case of Estonia, Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 13(5), pp. 1192-1214. https://www.emerald.com/insight/2053-4604.htm.

Liliana, I-F., & Dragomir, D.V., & Rîndașu, S-M., & OanaCristina S, & Curea, S.C., & Bunea, M., & Lavinia Barna, L.E. (2025), Business simulation games from the perspective of accounting and management professors: Implications for sustainability education in universities, The International Journal of Management Education, 23(2), 1-24. DOI:10.1016/j.ijme.2025.101147

Mabalay, A. A. (2026), Systematic review and mapping of service-learning functions and SDG integration in business education, The International Journal of Management Education, 24(2), No. 101345. DOI:10.1016/j.ijme.2025.101345

Magro, A., & Marie Gring-Pemble, L., & Charish R. B. (2022), Integrating liberal education, business, and high-impact practices – the case of George Mason University’s School of Business, Journal of International Education in Business, 15(1), pp. 32-51. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIEB-03-2021-0041

Masoudi, S., & Asgari, A. (2024). The effect of macroeconomic variables on entrepreneurship in industry in Iran: TVP-FAVAR approach. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 17(1), 143-161. doi: 10.22059/jed.2023.358923.654187. (In Persian).

Mir, N., & Rahimi Kia, A., & Daraei, M. (2024). Designing an entrepreneurial ecosystem model in a university with a knowledge-based approach. Management and Educational Perspective, 6(2), 167-193. doi: 10.22034/jmep.2024.430532.1300. (In Persian).

Mohtadi, M. M. (2023). marriage and family formation; A metaphor for understanding entrepreneurship and starting a business. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 16(2), 51-62. doi: 10.22059/jed.2023.354376.654130. (In Persian).

Mohaisen, S. H., & Rahimi Aghdam, S., & Hosseini,S.S., & Ahmadian,V. (2025). The impact of strategic alignment of information technology on international success: The mediating role of innovation culture in small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of value creating in Business Management, 5(3), 406-428. doi: 10.22034/jvcbm.2025.534558.1586. (In Persian).

Nunnally, J. C. (1978), "Psychometric theory", Second ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.

Omidi, N. (2025). Applicability of the German Mittelstand Model in Iran: A Framework for the Development of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 18(4), 31-54. doi: 10.22059/jed.2025.398407.654552. (In Persian).

Parasuraman, A., & Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). "SERVQUAL: a Multi-item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality", Journal of Retailing, (64), 2-40.

Peterson, R. A. (1994). "A meta-analysis of cronbach,s coefficient alpha", Journal of consumer research, (21), pp. 381-391.

Rezaei Sadrabadi, Z., & Mirfakhradini, S. H., & Andalib Ardakani, D. (2025). Investigating the impact of open enablers on the agility of selected small and medium enterprises in Yazd Industrial Estate. Journal of value creating in Business Management, 5(2), 47-69. doi: 10.22034/jvcbm.2024.445342.1322. (In Persian).

Safarnejad Nokashti, M. H., & Rezaei Dizgah, M., & Goodarzvand Chegini, M. (2026). Designing a development model for consumer cooperatives in Iran. Journal of value creating in Business Management, 5(4), 343-360. doi: 10.22034/jvcbm.2025.501556.1487. (In Persian).

Shams, R., & Jasim, M., & Mustafeed Z., & Rajibul H., & Jean-François L., & Raouf A. R. (2025), Brand affiliations toward business relationships, communication, and performance in B2B food SCM setting: Conceptualization and validation, Industrial Marketing Management, 129, 79-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2025.07.005.

Vajdi Vahid, M., & Yadollahi Farsi, J., & Sakhdari, K., & Rezvani, M. (2026). The conceptual model of two-generational business model innovation in family firms: Case study of family firms in the publishing industry. Journal of value creating in Business Management, 5(4), 64-94. doi: 10.22034/jvcbm.2024.460682.1389. (In Persian).

Vahabi Abyaneh, M., & Mobini Dehkordi, A. (2025). KCP: A Novel Framework for Designing and Implementing Innovative Ideas in Social Entrepreneurship. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 18. 25-45. doi: 10.22059/jed.2025.103840. (In Persian).

Vanderwerf, P., & Brush, C. (1989), "Toward agreement on the focus of entrepreneurship research: Progress without definition", Paper Presented at the National Academy of management, Washington, D. C.

Van de ven, A., & Ferry, D. (1979), "Measuring and assessing organizations", John Wiley, New York.